ALL PLANETS

GJ 9066 c

GJ 9066 · · 3154

GJ 9066 c’s modelled colour is teal #98d5e4: methane in its cold air absorbs the red end of the spectrum, leaving blue-green, and its 3,154 K red-dwarf sun tilts the whole colour warmer.

Modelled Radial Velocity

EXOSCOPE GJ 9066 c · reflected light · 380–780 nm VIEW
RUN
0.140.270.410.54 Roman is blind here 380 nm 780 nm
0.140.270.410.54 Roman is blind here 380 nm 780 nm
A(λ) — share of starlight reflected, per wavelength 50100 nm/div
PALETTE OUT ▸
#133e49
#267b8f
#41b2cd
#88cee0
#cfebf2
#00325c
#0063b5
#0f92ff
#69bbff
#c2e3ff
#4e3a0e
#99731c
#daa834
#e8c87f
#f6e9cb
.ASE ◎ SIMILAR COLOURS ⇄ COMPARE

Light source SWAPPED FOR THE SUN

A planet makes no visible light of its own — every colour on this page is starlight, reflected. This swatch is the lamp itself: GJ 9066's own colour, modelled as a 3154 K (cool stars glow orange-red, Sun-like stars warm white, hot stars blue-white), shown at the same display brightness as the planet swatches. Modelled, not photographed.

When the Light source knob above is set to the Sun, this panel follows: the lamp becomes the Sun, and the duotone pairs it with the planet's Sun-lit colour.

is the designer take-away: star + planet as a two-ink pair — the lamp, and what the planet makes of its light.
GJ 9066 · M5.0 V · 3154 K #ffbd77 the light this planet reflects its real star:
DUOTONE ▸ star + planet · Sun-lit
#ffbd77
#98d5e4
.ASE

Where in the sky

The whole sky flattened into one map, in the coordinates printed star charts use: right ascension (the sky's longitude, in hours — running right to left, as on a chart held overhead) and declination (the sky's latitude — positive means northern sky, negative southern). The crosshair marks GJ 9066, this planet's host star. Every faint dot is another star in this catalog with a modelled planet.

Like any flat map of a sphere, it distorts: the top and bottom edges are the , each a single point smeared across the full width (the brighter mid-line is the celestial equator). The dense white patch near 19h, +45° is the — one small region the Kepler telescope stared at for four years, piling up hundreds of discoveries. The dots map where we looked, not where planets are.

What you could ever see from your backyard is the star — no exoplanet is visible to the eye through any telescope. But the planet is physically there, inside that point of light. Press ⌂ Your horizon to see the map the way you'd experience it outside right now: everything below the line is under your feet.
0h6h12h18h24h-60°+60° ARIES
0h12h24h-60°+60° ARIES
Viewing from

Aries 2h 00m · +13° 03′ V 12.7

At magnitude 12.7 this star is below the naked-eye limit (≈ 6.5 under a dark sky) — telescope territory. It still sits at these coordinates, in Aries.

▸ Find GJ 9066 in your sky tonight — every host star above your horizon right now

Move this planet What if it orbited somewhere else?

A planet's colour is mostly a consequence of where it is. Drag it inward and it heats up: methane breaks apart, cloud decks boil away, sodium starts eating the yellow out of its star's light. Drag it outward and everything freezes and condenses back. This slider re-runs the colour model at each distance and shows you the result.

Temperature is scaled from this planet's own as distance to the power of −½, holding the star fixed — so at its real orbit the slider reproduces the colour at the top of this page exactly, and moves away from there.

This is not a measurement. It is one model's opinion about a planet that is not where we put it.

The marks under the slider are the reference grid — independently published model spectra at 0.8, 2, 5 and 10 AU, the set the Roman Coronagraph community uses. Click one to jump there and compare. Where the two disagree, that gap is the honest size of the uncertainty — the grid models cloud condensation chemistry that our smooth model only approximates. The grid is computed for a Sun-like star, so its distances are used as published rather than rescaled for this host.

#98d5e4 where it really is
reference grid — click a mark to compare the two models there
A year on this planet

Its orbit is (e = 0.46), so it does not stay at one distance: it runs from 0.475 AU at its closest to 1.28 AU at its furthest, and its modelled colour changes as it goes. It moves fastest when closest, so it spends only near that scorching inner point.

This is not a second model — it is the slider above, driven by the clock instead of by your hand. The planet's distance around one orbit comes from solving Kepler's equation, in equal steps of time, which is why the loop dwells out in the cold and flashes through rather than spending half the year at each end.

The caveat that matters: every colour here assumes the atmosphere is instantly in balance with the starlight falling on it. Real atmospheres lag — clouds and chemistry take far longer to catch up than a fast periastron pass allows. Treat this as where the model points, not as a forecast of what a telescope would see on a given night.

How much of this colour is the model's opinion? Change one assumption

Nobody has measured this planet's clouds or its . The pipeline has to assume both to produce a colour at all, and it says so on every page. Here you can turn those assumptions and watch what they were worth.

Each swatch changes exactly one assumption and re-runs the model; everything else, including the planet's real temperature and its star, is held fixed. The number under each is , the standard measure of how far apart two colours look: below about 2 the eye cannot tell, above about 10 they are plainly different colours.

A planet whose swatches barely move is one where the assumptions do not matter much. One where they swing wildly is a planet whose colour you should trust less — and that is worth being able to see rather than being asked to take on trust.

#98d5e4

Planet data ()

This planet's light has never been isolated by any telescope; both colours are modelled.

Each planet value is tagged by origin: measured (a real datum from the NASA Exoplanet Archive), computed (derived from the star + orbit), or assumed (an archetype default because no data exists for this planet).

Spectrum source: . Atmosphere is always assumed (we hold no per-planet cloud/metallicity data). : cold, thick clouds + methane; : 19.6× solar; : 0°. Planet and star data: NASA Exoplanet Archive. All sources and credits →
Colour ·
Base hex#98d5e4
Lit by its own star — the colour on its gallery card
Out of
Planet
66 measured
Radius9.6 measured
Mass66.7 measured
0.88 measured
Distance from Earth14.6 measured
Discovery · 2020

Could it hold liquid water?

The habitable zone is the ring around a star where a planet gets about the right amount of starlight for liquid water to survive on its surface — too close and an ocean boils away, too far and it freezes. Its edges come from climate models (Kopparapu et al. 2014) and depend only on the star's temperature and brightness, so we can work them out for every star in this catalog.

The solid band is the conservative zone that those models support directly. The faint band around it is the optimistic zone, stretched out to where Venus and Mars appear to have held surface water early in their history.

This is geography, not biology. It places the orbit; it cannot tell you whether the planet has an atmosphere, an ocean, or anything living in it.

▽ TOO FAR — this orbit receives 0.0031× the starlight Earth does, far too little to keep water liquid at the surface. The habitable zone lies further in, inside 0.11 AU.

0.030.10.31 0.0530.1 star 0.88 AU
0.030.10.31 0.0530.1 star 0.88 AU
Starlight received 0.0031× Earth's This star's zone 0.053 – 0.1 AU This orbit 0.88 AU
  • An eccentric orbit (e = 0.46) carries it in and out across the zone over a year; we classify by its average distance.